Saturday, June 27, 2020

Crush the Cornerstone


Dear Boo and Bubble,

We are living through some very difficult and roiling times right now. Once again, our country seems to be going through yet another iteration of its grappling with the aftermath of the American Civil War and the eternally linked issue of civil rights for people of color. You’d think 150 years is a sufficient amount of time for most any wound to heal and for such matters to be sorted out, but alas, not in this case. (I alluded to this in my last post called “The Merry-Go-Round.”)

At least the debate this time seems to have brought some tiny shift of focus and the questions raised are of a slightly different nature. For the first time that I can remember there is serious discussion about whether military bases of the United States should logically bear the names of men who made the conscious decision to secede from and fight against the very same United States. And, seemingly untouchable yet controversial statues honoring Confederate leadership in communities across the country are now coming down.

Perhaps the most intriguing difference this time for me, though, is the overwhelming sense of ignorance that I feel upon learning for the first time about significant events in the history of our country…events experienced by hundreds of thousands of people whose existence was relegated to the underground of an alternate universe and, therefore, never brought to the attention of people like me through any incorporation in my formal education. As a college history major, I am embarrassed and mortified. And because of this mortification, I am determined to make sure that you do not suffer the same lack of awareness.

The history of a country cannot…and should not…be bifurcated by race. What happens to any of us, happens to all of us. Those who officially record events for posterity cannot choose which ones happened and which did not. No matter the effort, there is no sufficient whitewash to erase reality. Sooner or later, the whispers of truth are given the microphone by uncontrollable circumstances. We are in such a moment right now…and I have learned about these things.

(With credits to Wikipedia and JSTOR/Daily)

Tulsa, Oklahoma’s Greenwood District — In 1921, Tulsa, Oklahoma’s Greenwood District, known as Black Wall Street, was one of the most prosperous African American communities in the United States. But on May 31 of that year, the Tulsa Tribune reported that a black man, Dick Rowland, attempted to rape a white woman, Sarah Page. Whites in the area refused to wait for the investigative process to play out, sparking two days of unprecedented racial violence. Thirty-five city blocks went up in flames, 300 people died, and 800 were injured. Defense of white female virtue was the expressed motivation for the collective racial violence.

Juneteenth — Juneteenth is the oldest nationally celebrated commemoration of the ending of slavery in the United States. Dating back to 1865, it was on June 19th that the Union soldiers, led by Major General Gordon Granger, landed at Galveston, Texas with news that the war had ended and that the enslaved were now free. Note that this was two and a half years after President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation - which had become official January 1, 1863. The Emancipation Proclamation had little impact on the Texans due to the minimal number of Union troops to enforce the new Executive Order. However, with the surrender of General Lee in April of 1865, and the arrival of General Granger’s regiment, the forces were finally strong enough to influence and overcome the resistance.

The Wilmington Coup of 1898 — Also known as the Wilmington Insurrection or the Wilmington Massacre of 1898, it occurred in Wilmington, North Carolina, on Thursday, November 10, 1898. It is considered a turning point in post-Reconstruction North Carolina politics. The event initiated an era of more severe racial segregation and effective disenfranchisement of African Americans throughout the South, a shift already underway since passage by Mississippi of a new constitution in 1890, raising barriers to voter registration. Laura Edwards wrote in Democracy Betrayed (2000): "What happened in Wilmington became an affirmation of white supremacy not just in that one city, but in the South and in the nation as a whole," as it affirmed that invoking "whiteness" eclipsed the legal citizenship, individual rights, and equal protection under the law that blacks were guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The white press in Wilmington originally described the event as a race caused by black. However, over time, with more facts publicized, the event has come to be seen as a coup d’etat, the violent overthrow of a duly elected government, by a group of white supremacists. Multiple causes brought it about. It is claimed to be the only such incident in American history, (other late Reconstruction Era violence did not result in a direct 'coup' or removal and replacement of elected officials by unelected individuals).
The coup occurred after the state's white Southern Democrats conspired and led a mob of 2,000 white men to overthrow the legitimately elected local government. They expelled opposition black and white political leaders from the city, destroyed the property and businesses  of black citizens built up since the end of the Civil War, including the only black newspaper in the city, and killed an estimated 60 to more than 300 people.

Alexander H. Stephens Cornerstone Speech — Delivered extemporaneously by the vice president of the Confederacy on March 21, 1861, in Savannah, GA, a few weeks before the Civil War began, this speech explained implicitly and without equivocation that slavery was the cornerstone of the motivation for the South’s rebellion against the union of the United States. It began:
The Constitution has put at rest forever all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution—African slavery as it exists among us—the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson, in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the "rock upon which the old Union would split." He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old Constitution were, that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with; but the general opinion of the men of that day was, that, somehow or other, in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the idea of a Government built upon it—when the "storm came and the wind blew, it fell."
Stephens contended that advances and progress in the sciences proved that the 18th-century view that "all men are created equal" was erroneous and that all men were not created equal. He stated that advances in science proved that enslavement of African Americans by white men was justified and that it coincided with the Bible’s teachings. He also stated that the Confederacy was the first country in the world founded on the principle of racial supremacy.
“Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science.”
Stephens stated that the Confederacy's belief in human inequality was adhering to the "laws of nature":
“May we not therefore look with confidence to the ultimate universal acknowledgement of the truths upon which our system rests? It is the first government ever instituted upon the principles in strict conformity to nature, and the ordination of Providence, in furnishing the materials of human society. Many governments have been founded upon the principle of the subordination and serfdom of certain classes of the same race; such were and are in violation of the laws of nature. Our system commits no such violation of nature's laws.”

(I must tell you, boys, that these words are abhorrent to me. They are lies in every sense—moral, Biblical, political, societal. It is just staggering that we are still trying to beat them down.)

In closing, I found this editorial in today’s Washington Post written by Kathleen Parker. She is an acquaintance of our family—your mom used to babysit her son. I found it somewhat apropos to the topic of the South and how slow its customs are to fall.


No comments:

Post a Comment