Dear Boo and Bubble,
My last blog about Great Granddaddy Schaefer had me thinking
about all the lawyers in your lineage – your dad, Captain and Schaefer. Combined, that adds up to about 90 years of
“lawyering,” which calculates to some 180,000 hours of “billable time” – the
stock and trade of any lawyer worth his or her salt.
There is a mystique about the profession – that somehow when
a lawyer says something, the words contain more gravity than those of common
folk. In fact, over the years, lawyers have
elevated the constitution of words to a form of art for which clients seem to
willingly pay a dear price.
In one of his editorials for The Greenville News, Granddaddy Schaefer confessed to this practice
and I thought I would share it with you.
Lawyers Never See Phrases They
Can’t Puff Up
Sunday, September 5, 1993
The bottom rung on
lawyers’ ladder of affection for acronyms is KISS – Keep It Simple Stupid. The top rung is MILC (pronounced MILK) – Make
It Long and Complicated.
When you die you want
to leave everything you own to your wife.
When the yeast of a lawyer’s lingo completes its work, the simple statement,
“I leave everything I own to my wife” is puffed up to this: “I give, devise and bequeath all of my
estate, real, personal and mixed, of whatsoever nature and kind, and
wheresoever situate, of which I may die seized and possessed, unto my beloved
wife, to be hers absolutely in fee simple.”
The lawyer doesn’t
trust the word “leave” so it becomes, “…give devise and bequeath.” He doesn’t trust, “everything I own,” so it
becomes, “…all of my estate, real, personal and mixed, of whatsoever nature and
kind, and wheresoever situate, of which I may die seized and possessed.” And, “…to be hers absolutely in fee simple”
is a fee enhancer since it will require a professional explanation of “fee
simple.”
Lawyers, it seems, are
incapable of finding a contract in their form books that does not contain the
phrase, “including but not limited to.”
Their fascination for this phrase is an abiding mystery.
All contracts, of
course, are fee bearing trees, and the thing that shakes out the fruit is the
pendulum on the lawyer’s time keeping clock.
The more ticks, the more fruit.
This generates a parade of redundancies and the drum major of this
cavalcade of words is “whereas.” Then
comes (including but not limited to) “Notwithstanding,” “aforesaid,”
“hereinafter,” “hereinabove,” “by and between,” “in hand paid,” “hereby,”
“hereto,” “subject to,” “hereof,” “wherein” – this colorful parade of
banalities goes on and on, as does the clock and its fee generating ticks.
It is a beneficent
Jehovah who led King David to shun law school.
Had he been successful in passing the LSAT, made Phi Beta Kappa and the
Law Review, that magnificent 121st Psalm, in its opening
proclamation, “I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my
help. My help cometh from The Lord,
which made heaven and earth,” would have been buried under an avalanche of
legalese, and would have come out something like this:
“I will lift up and
elevate my gaze, my view, my optic perception unto (including but not limited
to) the hills, ridges, knolls, mountains, and all other earthly convolutions
that make up the topography, from whence cometh (including but not limited to)
A) my help, B) my sustenance, C) my food, D) my clothing, E) my raiment, and
all other material that covers my body to keep it warm and protect it from the
elements. My help does not come from
those things enumerated hereinabove from A) through E), both inclusive. No, my help does not come from one or any
combination of these things so enumerated, but my help comes from Yahweh, a/k/a
Jehovah, a/k/a God.”
Each day I thank the
kind Heavenly Father that Jesus was not a lawyer. I hate to think how the Lord’s Prayer would
have fared, and how many volumes the Sermon on the Mount would have filled had
he been a member of the Jerusalem Bar.
We lawyers don’t KISS,
we MILC.
No comments:
Post a Comment