Dear Boo and Bubble,
They say "Timing is
Everything" and, as
you get older, you'll find that many outcomes in your life boil down
to just that.....timing. It's even more so in politics. Many a
politician has been elected or defeated because of the timing of
events. This is particularly true when the passage of laws result in
sweeping changes. A natural gestation period of reaction occurs
when there is significant change.... before people have the opportunity to absorb the benefits. During this period, those elected officials who initiated the change become vulnerable to the reaction and opponents
seize the opportunity to ride its crest into office.
This phenomenon is exactly
what happened to Captain as he sought re-election for his House seat
in 1985. The debate over the Education Improvement Act raged so
fiercely in the House of Representatives that the legislative session
was extended beyond its regular adjournment date at the beginning of
June. This created quite a problem because in normal election years, incumbents would have the summer to
campaign in the Democratic or Republican primaries held around Labor
Day and before the general elections in November. But, Captain was a
floor leader for the legislation and he could not leave Columbia to come
home. He was once again opposed by Donna Moss, the woman whom he had
defeated before. In his absence, she not only combed the district unabated shoring
up votes, but also took every opportunity to criticize Captain's
support of the EIA and its one-penny hike in the sales tax.
Captain even had to miss his
one major fundraiser, a dinner at Limestone College where he was to
be the featured speaker. Instead, he had to enlist Nick Theodore, a
state Senator from Greenville, to stand in for him The Senate had
already concluded its work on the EIA with a positive vote and was
waiting for the House to finish deliberating. When the House finally
completed and passed its version of the bill, Captain still had to
assist in the work of the conference committee between the two
chambers before things were over. By the time the EIA passed into law, the process had dragged on well into
the summer and Captain only a few
weeks remaining to campaign before the primary vote.
Over the years, Captain has
remarked that had the primary been six months to a year later, he
would have won convincingly. But, as timing dictated, we were in the
period of reaction to the EIA. It would take several months for the
law to even go into effect and consequently the air of speculation
and suspicion overwhelmed any truth about its real impact because
that was yet to be felt. Captain advocated very hard for the law,
trying to explain that for every dollar sent to Columbia in sales
tax, the district would receive two dollars in support of educational
improvement. He found opposition from all quarters, even within the
teaching community as many were unsure about the testing and
evaluation components of the law. It was political
purgatory......the timing was rotten. As he had predicted on that
day driving home from the meeting with Governor Riley, his support of
the EIA would cost him the election.
When the various parts of the
law began to take effect in the coming months, approval for it
increased. Many parents who had place their children in private
schools began to readmit them due to a renewed trust in the level of
commitment on the part of the state to upgrading public education.
Innovation, creativity, accountability and inclusion were hallmarks
of the EIA, as well as a dedicated funding source.
There is a phrase - "A
leader needs to be out in front of his constituents, but not so far
that they mistake him for the enemy." I am reminded of
Captain every time I hear this. He had the capacity to grasp the
risks of his leadership in a crucial time and understood the
consequences that he might suffer. In this case, timing made him the
enemy........a little more time would have made him a very good
friend.
(Captain was one of many who lost elections because of the EIA. After Governor Riley left office, the whole political landscape changed in South Carolina and a new contingent arrived to direct the state. Without the original stewards of the law, the dismantlement of the EIA soon began. I have no idea what is left, if anything.......other than the one-cent increase in the sales tax that, more than likely, resides in the General Fund.)
No comments:
Post a Comment