Dear Boo and Bubble,
It’s Sunday morning and we awoke to temperatures in the
40’s. Looks like tonight might be our
first evening of fall with an anticipated low in the 30’s…..pretty remarkable
for mid-September. It’s also a little
overcast and dreary which has me in a contemplative mood with the need to share
something that’s been on my mind recently…..the observation, of late, on how
dogma in religious institutions tend to get in the way of the ultimate
commandment to “Love thy neighbor as
thyself.”
To be honest with you, I struggle with organized religion
because it seems to be a misnomer. Every
religion on the face of the earth appears to be fractured into so many
splinters that what is professed from the pulpit of one denominational church
isn’t even given credence in another of similar stripes. The tenets of faith, which one would think
should unite us, tend to cast us into disparate camps of contention, creating
intractable differences that play out in every facet of our lives. (It is often said one should never discuss
religion or politics. That’s sad to me
two lumped together – indicative of how divisive both have become.)
As I’ve shared with you before, I am resolved to hang my
religious hat on the nail of 1 John 4:8 – Whoever
does not love, does not know God, for God is love. (See post on November 16, 1024 entitled Cottrell, Needleman and Me.) That keeps it simple for me. If something is prohibiting me from loving my
fellow man, I am compelled to root it out.
On occasions like this, when my mind is centered on such
matters, I often turn to the writings of your great, great, great, great
grandfather Joseph Benson Cottrell just to see what he might have to say. (He is, after all, the one who penned the comment
“I knew a woman once who loved her church
so much, she couldn’t love her neighbor.”) This morning, I found the
following passage from his 1873 scrapbook entitled “Emerson.” It was an article he wrote for the Central Methodist as a
correspondent for the Louisville Methodist Conference. His words resonated with me and helped me
understand that, as in most everything, it is human frailty at the heart of the
problem.
Much perplexity comes
in our attempts to express in precise and definite terms and in logical order
all that pertains to life and salvation.
God expresses this is a living order, and there is mutual dependence –
reciprocal interplay and support – among the variant, yet organically unified,
parts that make up the concrete fact.
But when we come to express –
to explicate – to demonstrate – in words, what may only be expressed by the
life itself, there is inevitably mere approximation. What we say – our systems of philosophy and
theology, are tentative. They are essays
of the human mind to re-speak what God has uttered; and if what we know of the
divine life and the divine work be only as they are reported to us by man, we
will be acquainted therewith very much as we are with one whose photographs we
have had shown us by friends, and of whom we have heard them speak. We are to come into the very measure of life
and power – of duty and privilege – immediately, and not suppose that the
pictures of flame may warm us – that pictures of food and of water may nourish
and refresh us.
Yet, it is inevitable
that each one will for himself formulate the faith. He must cast the outline of his own form in
shadow, as he stands in the light, and as he may only acquaint himself with
himself formally thus, his knowledge of himself must ever be partial. Why may men not learn to be modest and
self-distrusting in view of this fact?
Why such dogmatism – such rigidity and inflexibility by such as assume
to teach and govern? Alas, for human
weakness? It is the occasion of
arrogance rather than of humility.
Upon no subject is
there such intolerance and bitterness as upon that which no man can know
perfectly, viz: The Divine government, as it includes the facts and comprehends
the forces incident to its administration over the agents whose obedience must
be according to knowledge and choice, and not according to necessitating force.
I love how he compares the knowledge we gain about God through our theologies and philosophies, to pictures of a flame that can never warm us or pictures of food and water that can never fully nourish and refresh us. Rather, it is as we live out our lives in love and relationship to others, that we experience for ourselves God’s divine love and purpose and feel the warmth and nourishment of God’s presence for ourselves. Another of JB Cottrell’s comparisons that struck me when you posted one of his essays a while back, was the one about how biblical literalism has the same effect as one who tries to eat the corn, husk and all, or the fish, scales and all. He goes on to say that God gave us the gift of scripture just like he gave us the gift of food; but, God expects us to make use of the parts that are digestible—not just eat the whole thing! (I am paraphrasing, of course. His words were so much more eloquent!)
ReplyDeleteIt is heavy business when we try to describe the infinite with our finite vocabularies, but JB Cottrell comes about as close as it gets to doing that. What a legacy he has left in his writings! I am glad that you and John took the time and effort to collect them and publish them for other to read. Kathy